[safnog-oc] SAFNOG/EANOG/tzNOG Announcement - Final Draft
Frank Habicht
geier at geier.ne.tz
Tue Jun 19 10:10:06 UTC 2018
Hi all,
maybe to explain a little bit more.
We have serious push from the regulator to a) get IXPs in all kinds of
locations operational and b) all operators operating in & around these
locations MUST connect to these IXPs. In fact senior regulators visiting
IXPs and checking!
we know plugging a cable in doesn't make traffic flow...
several national operators in TZ do currently show up at several TZ IXPs.
And some less experienced folk as questions: how do we do that so it
doesn't loop (paraphrased).
PCH has the nice presentations about the hot potatoes. And I have told
Nishal of the need - he's warned.
Not necessarily inside the SafNOG program, possibly the day following
it, I would like us to get the right people between "enable" and
decision-making in a room and get that cleared up. And maybe to have it
less publicly advertised might help attendance and active participation.
That 2nd item, v6, was basically to do a hackathon very similar to Dakar.
Sit someone down (who has v6 capable upstream(s)), who has the buy-in
and approval for doing changes (if needed) , and go through the steps.
Maybe 2nd day after official SafNOG program, or 2nd half of first day.
I strongly believe these are both different target audience from TzNOG
students.
We can / should look at both separately. At the moment (in my mind) not
asking anything of SafNOG. But some of Nishal ;-)
Frank
On 6/19/2018 12:36 PM, Erik Rowberg wrote:
> this looks good.
>
> TISPA would like to add two workshops
>
> 1-Nishal to explain the logics of effective routing (with many IXPs) to
> all the ISPs in TZ connecting to several IXPs. We are having some
> issues now that we have many IXs.
>
> 2- Also from Frank " last thursday at ipv6 taskforce we had the idea
> of sitting people
> down "do it, now, here, this way" - voluntarily - during the same
> time." We want it done there and then.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu
> <mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu>> wrote:
>
> Thanks, John.
>
> After all is said and done, I'm proposing:
>
> * 24th - 26th - conference
> * 26th - conference + workshop (parallel sessions)
> * 27th - 29th - workshop
>
> Mark.
>
> On 18/Jun/18 12:00, John Gitau Njoroge (jgitau) wrote:
>>
>> Good day Mark
>>
>> And apologies, travel has kept me away from emails for the last
>> two weeks.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am working to ensure I am in Tanzania the entire duration. Just
>> for clarity are you proposing:
>>
>> 24^th – 26^th – Meeting
>>
>> 27^th – 29^th – Training or
>>
>> 26^th – 29^th - Training – to allow for 4 days training
>>
>>
>>
>> Meantime for EANOG we will update our site , I believe you got a
>> logo and as soon as the dates are ready also try and get a few
>> students out to TZ.
>>
>>
>>
>> JG
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu>
>> <mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu>
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 18, 2018 12:43 PM
>> *To:* Abibu R. Ntahigiye <abibu at tznic.or.tz>
>> <mailto:abibu at tznic.or.tz>; safnog-oc at safnog.org
>> <mailto:safnog-oc at safnog.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [safnog-oc] SAFNOG/EANOG/tzNOG Announcement -
>> Final Draft
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18/Jun/18 09:29, Abibu R. Ntahigiye wrote:
>>
>> Members,
>>
>> We agreed for the tzNOG training to be for 4 days (26th to
>> 29th Sept 2018).
>>
>>
>> Naturally, we don't want the conference and the tzNOG workshop to
>> clash.
>>
>> I am really keen on doing a 3-day meeting this year for SAFNOG,
>> especially since we also have EANOG on-board. Is there any chance
>> we can have tzNOG running 27th - 29th?
>>
>> Alternatively, we could only have the clash on the 26th, where
>> the tzNOG either starts the whole day, or starts in the afternoon.
>>
>> Grateful if the OC members can be more active in discussing these
>> plans, as it is delaying making announcements to the community.
>> E-mail will be the our most active mode of communication.
>>
>> Also, once we put something out into the wild, it's almost
>> impossible to pull it back, so let's participate actively please.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> safnog-oc mailing list
> safnog-oc at safnog.org <mailto:safnog-oc at safnog.org>
> http://lists.safnog.org/listinfo/safnog-oc
> <http://lists.safnog.org/listinfo/safnog-oc>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> safnog-oc mailing list
> safnog-oc at safnog.org
> http://lists.safnog.org/listinfo/safnog-oc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.safnog.org/pipermail/safnog-oc/attachments/20180619/07af7226/attachment.html>
More information about the safnog-oc
mailing list