[safnog] [afnog] RIPE WHOIS & IRR Database for Out-Of-Region Resources

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sat Aug 11 06:45:04 UTC 2018



On 10/Aug/18 03:48, Randy Bush wrote:

> this advice is a bit controversial.  see
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpkimaxlen-00
>
> i have no big agenda either way.
>
> i suggest that the best practice is to roa exactly what you announce in
> bgp, no more no less.

I agree that it's a tricky one. But in my experience, nearly 100% of all
Invalids are due to more-specifics not ROA'd vis a vis the parent aggregate.

Ultimately, it appears folk are either lazy to ROA for every prefix they
originate, or not educated enough about RPKI to do it right.

My personal preference (and best practice) would be to ROA and originate
specifically. Then again, I also say best practice is not to
de-aggregate, but alas...

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.safnog.org/pipermail/safnog/attachments/20180811/7af0bf5d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the safnog mailing list