[safnog] RPKI discussions

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Apr 13 09:03:57 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 13/Apr/15 10:56, Patrick Okui wrote:
>
>
> As long as we're still at the point where many invalid prefixes are
> actually valid due to network engineer errors it is infeasible for
> network operators to blindly drop those prefixes. End-sites maybe.

Completely agree.

We found this out painfully, even though it did not surprise us.

Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=54ZW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the safnog mailing list